Computer-assisted instruction in parasitology: a cross-over design.

We report here the results of the study using CAI compared to the hard copy for study of lessons in parasitology. We evaluated the CAI compared to hard copy lessons in 60 students, attending the third-year parasitology course at Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. The students were randomly divided into two groups (30 each). The lessons tested were Ascaris lumbricoides and Enterobius vermicularis, which were prepared as CAI and hard copy form. Using a cross-over design, the first group was provided CAI form on the topic of A. lumbricoides, then switched to hard copy form on the topic of E. vermicularis. The second group was provided hard copy form on the topic of A. lumbricoides, then switched to CAI form on the topic of E. vermicularis. After 30 minute reading, the 10-multiple choice question test was provided for each topic. There was no significant difference of the scores between 2 groups. The most students (91.67%) had more satisfaction when using CAI compared to hard copy in terms of easy to use, convenient to use, less time consuming, more understandable, more attractive to read, and less stress for study. There were 32.8% students complaining that reading hard copy was boring. Other comments were stress when reading (2%), more difficult (17.2%) and more time needed to search specific information (17.2%), and wasting papers (17.2%). However 58.6% still complained problems when using CAL. About 25% had physical discomfort (e.g. Headache, eye pain), and 25% had difficulty to access to use CAI (e.g. no computers available, problems with computer or network error). We suggested that instructors should create and improve CAI lessons in biomedical sciences both in quantity and quality (e.g. content with details, pictures, narrations).

Comparative assessment of an Og4C3 ELISA and an ICT filariasis test: a study of Myanmar migrants in Thailand.

Detection of circulating filarial antigen has now emerged as an alternative method for the diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. We compared two antigen detection assays, an Og4C3 ELISA and an ICT (immunochromatography) Filariasis test, for the diagnosis of Wuchereria bancrofti infections in migrant Myanmar workers in Tak province, Western Thailand. A total of 337 Myanmars participated in this study. The microfilarial rate was 3.3%. The Og4C3 ELISA could detect 19.1% of bancroftian filariasis while the ICT test detected 12.7%. Both antigen assays could detect all microfilaremics. The Og4C3 ELISA detected 14.8% of amicrofilaremics while the ICT test identified 8.1%. Those who were positive for the ICT test were also positive by the Og4C3 ELISA. Those Og4C3 positive cases, that were ICT negative (ICT-ve/Og4C3+ve) had statistically significant (p < 0.05, unpaired t-test) lower Og4C3 antigen levels (409.5 units, range 117-2,389) than those that were ICT positive (ICT+ve/Og4C3+ve) (5,252.0 units, range 130-28,062). Our results emphasize the problem of bancroftian filariasis in Myanmar migrants working in Thailand. Close monitoring and control of this disease in Myanmar migrants are of public health importance. Antigen detection systems are promising tools for the surveillance of bancroftian filariasis.

Prevalence of bancroftian filariasis on the Thai-Myanmar border.

To achieve the goal of eliminating lymphatic filariasis by the year 2020, close monitoring systems and effective control strategies need to be implemented and the real disease burden needs to be assessed. Bancroftian filariasis is endemic at the Thai-Myanmar border. However, there are only limited data on the prevalence of this disease in Thailand available. We employed microscopic examination, together with ELISA kits to detect W. bancrofti-specific Og4C3 circulating antigen and specific anti-filarial IgG4 antibodies to determine the burden of bancroftian filariasis in an endemic area at the Thai-Myanmar border in Umphang District, Tak province, Thailand. A total of 433 Thai-Karen blood samples were analyzed. The microfilarial rate determined by microscope was 6% and the W. bancrofti-specific Og4C3 antigenemia rate was 22%, while the specific anti-filarial IgG4 antibody rate was 54%. There were statistically significant higher levels of W. bancrofti-specific Og4C3 antigen in the microfilaremic-antigenemic group than in the amicrofilaremic-antigenemic group (unpaired Student's t-test; p < 0.001), similar to the specific anti-filarial IgG4 antibody results (unpaired Student's t-test; p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation of moderate degree between the presence of W. bancrofti-specific Og4C3 antigen and of specific anti-filarial IgG4 antibody was found in the amicrofilaremic group (r = 0.474, p < 0.001), but not in the microfilaremic group (r = 0.291, p > 0.05). Our study revealed a very high prevalence of bancroftian filariasis in this endemic area and thus emphasized the importance of using highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tools to evaluate the true prevalence of the disease.